Page Six Report Highlights Meghan Markle’s Continued Use of Royal Styling
Meghan Markle faces new backlash over alleged use of royal “HRH” styling on personal materials, raising questions about authenticity and royal branding.
Meghan Markle is once again at the center of controversy after Page Six reported that the Duchess of Sussex has continued to use her royal styling, including the “HRH” (Her Royal Highness) title, on personal and professional materials — despite stepping back from royal duties in 2020.
According to the report, personal stationery used by the Sussexes allegedly includes royal-style monograms, and their team has been known to refer to Meghan and Harry as “ma’am” and “sir.”
Use of Titles Sparks Renewed Debate
Critics of the Duchess argue that her continued use of royal styling contradicts her public stance on distancing from the monarchy. The couple stepped back from senior royal duties citing intense media scrutiny and a desire for independence from what Meghan described in interviews as a “restrictive and outdated royal institution.”
“It’s confusing to the public,” an insider told Page Six. “If she rejected the royal system, why is she still embracing the hierarchy and using the HRH title in private?”
Insider Claims and Sussex Response
While Page Six reported that staff members have been asked to use formal royal titles when addressing the couple, a spokesperson close to the Sussexes has denied this. According to the source, neither Meghan nor Harry has insisted on being addressed by their formal titles, and reports suggesting otherwise are “misleading.”
However, some observers claim that this isn’t an isolated issue. Meghan’s alleged use of HRH was previously noted in a handwritten card attached to a gift sent to a friend, which reignited discussions about her public and private use of royal identity.
Royal Branding vs. Authenticity: Public Perception in Question
The debate over Meghan’s use of royal styling has sparked larger questions about authenticity, branding, and public image. Royal commentators suggest that while the Duke and Duchess of Sussex promote independence and privacy, their connection to royal titles continues to play a role in their public profile, particularly in the U.S. where royal fascination remains strong.
“In the U.K., these titles carry formal significance,” said one royal expert. “But in the U.S., it often translates into prestige, exclusivity, and brand leverage.”
Prince Harry’s Position Remains Unclear
Some sources suggest that Prince Harry is supportive of Meghan’s use of HRH, viewing it as a subtle statement against the royal institution. Others believe Harry prefers to separate from royal formality.
Despite reports of tension within the royal family, there has been no official statement from the Palace or from Harry and Meghan directly addressing this new controversy.
Conclusion: A Symbolic Divide That Lingers
While Meghan and Harry have built a new life in California, their ties to royalty — whether through titles or public attention — continue to shape their public identity. As the media continues to scrutinize their choices, it’s clear that royal connections remain a complex and ongoing issue for the Sussexes.
—-
Meghan Markle, HRH title controversy, royal family news, Prince Harry, Sussex staff titles, royal branding, Page Six report, Meghan and Harry controversy, royal protocols, UK media